As well as studying orbs and researching their appearances on digital camera in the daytime and night time, I read other information of the phenomenon we call orbs. It's very interesting. The true metaphysical believers have their theories and explanations about orbs and the skeptical unbelievers have their theories and explanations about orbs. Both groups bring great theories to the table of content that could seem to explain the orb occurrences in either direction. Either direction meaning the orbs are living entities (spirits,fairies,alien probes,dimensional amebas) or the orbs are accidental findings (dust particles, rain drops, water particles in the air, mist, bugs). We also have to consider the fact that all we have within us to explain this orb phenomenon is the thought process at which we approach it, the thought forms that we as humans have been programmed with since childhood mostly determine the outcome of how we explain these orbs. As like in the field of ufology, some theories seem fitting while some theories seem ridiculous and in many UFO cases the circumstances the evidence and the witnesses involved are so overwhelming that there's no 3rd dimensional way possible to explain the advanced upper dimensional physics involved in the very real UFO events that have occurred in the past. With orbs, yes I believe that some can be dust particles, rain drops, water particles in the air, mist, or bugs. At the same time, I believe that many orbs are a living entity such as spirits, fairies, alien probes, dimensional amebas or other upper dimensional frequency intelligence yet to be uncovered and understood by our (un)conventional 3rd dimensional scientific community. In my experiences with photographing orbs, before every individual picture I snap, I always wipe clean my camera lens. I've taken pictures when water particles were in the air and in the same spot. Within 2 minutes and out of say 10 pictures taken some have orbs and some don't. If water particles were the cause for the skeptic's orb wouldn't all the 10 pictures have the water particle skeptic's orbs in them? The same goes with dust particles. How about the orbs that are round and white that moved with what seems to be intelligence and when they are caught on camera, in the process of moving, they leave a trail from the spot they were to the spot they are. Water particles don't do that on camera. Dust doesn't do that on camera. Mist just shows up as a dense dull fog. Bugs caught on camera in the act of flying are definitely not round, colorful, or bright see through orbs of light with images and patterns in them. Rain drops appearing on digital camera images can easily be distinguished between orbs and drops of water, even when the flash from the camera illuminates the rain drop. The average rain drop that's captured on digital camera with a flash looks like a little solid white orb, looking totally different than the paranormal orbs that come in many sizes and have many images within them. Then there's the rain drop that looks like an orb moving straight up, leaving a tail, giving it the appearance of a orb moving upwards. This type of rain drop appears like this on a digital image because when the camera snaps the rain drop image in motion, the initial flash illuminates the rain drop and then because the rain drop is in the process of falling down, the illuminated rain drop leaves a small trail going down at the same time, showing the illuminated rain drop above the trail. This gives the impression that the rain drop looks like a small white orb in the process of moving upward. As complicated as this may sound to some people, it's still easy to distinguish between an orb and a rain drop, illuminated by a camera's flash. There's also the skeptic's theory that newer digital cameras that are used to capture orbs are very small cameras and the flash is positioned too close to the camera's lens. It's been said that because of the camera's flash being to close to the camera's lens, light infractions emitted from the flash interfere with the picture, the result being camera flash orbs emitted from the flash itself showing up in the picture which the skeptics account for all orb pictures taken with digital camera with the flash on. If this were the case then wouldn't this mean that every picture taken with a newer digital camera have orbs showing up in all their photos taken?